Hampton v. Wetzel et al

Filing 83

ORDER denying pltf's motion 75 to substitute party. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/5/19. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAWN HAMPTON, Plaintiff v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-898 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 75) to substitute pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, wherein he requests that the court substitute a representative or successor of the deceased party Robin Lewis,1 and the court noting that Rule 25(a)(1) authorizes the substitution of a proper party for a deceased party if the claim against the deceased is not extinguished, see FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a)(1), and it appearing that the claims against Robin Lewis were dismissed on March 21, 2016 while she was named as Jane Doe Chief Hearing Examiner of the Department of Corrections (see Docs. 31, 32), and the court further noting that decisions regarding party substitutions plainly rest within the court’s discretion, see McKenna v. Pac. Rail Serv., 32 F.3d 820, 836 (3d Cir. 1994); FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a)(1) (providing that Robin Lewis died on December 21, 2015, before she was identified as a party to this action. (Doc. 61 ¶ 5). On May 4, 2018, defense counsel filed a suggestion of death upon the record. (Doc. 61). On July 16, 2018, plaintiff filed the instant motion to substitute. (Doc. 75). 1 the court “may order substitution of the proper party”) (emphasis added), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 75) is DENIED. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?