Dickerson et al v. York International Corporation et al

Filing 105

ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that the settlement administrator's remedial proposal is APPROVED & the court's 8/22/17 memo & order 100 101 approving the settlement sub judice is reaffirmed. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 11/30/17. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEVEN DICKERSON, et al., Plaintiffs v. YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-1105 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of the correspondence filed with the court by counsel for the plaintiff settlement class, wherein counsel indicates that the court-appointed settlement administrator erroneously coded an “objection” to the settlement as a “claim” and accordingly failed to apprise the court of same, and wherein counsel further indicates that the settlement administrator intends to remedy its error by paying 100% of the damages claimed by the objector, subject to the court’s approval, (see Doc. 105 at 1), and the court having reviewed the late-noticed objection and determining that the objection, concerning the adequacy of settlement reimbursements, is of identical nature to those previously addressed and rejected by the court, (see Doc. 100 at 1719), it is hereby ORDERED that the settlement administrator’s remedial proposal is APPROVED and the court’s August 22, 2017 memorandum and order (Docs. 100-01) approving the settlement sub judice is reaffirmed. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?