Walck v. Colvin

Filing 18

JUDGMENT ENTERED in favor of deft Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security & against pltf Dianne M. Walck, as follows: Commissioner's decision denying app for period of disability & disability ins benefits of Walck AFFIRMED in acc w/ ct's order 17 of 8/8/17. (See jgmt for complete details.) Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/8/17. (ki)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the MIDDLE DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA DIANNE M. WALCK, ) Plaintiff ) v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social ) Civil Action No. ) Security, 1:15-CV-1265 (Chief Judge Conner) ) Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): 9 the plaintiff defendant (name) dollars ($ %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of 9 x recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment %, along with costs. the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . other: JUDGMENT be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and against plaintiff DIANNE M. WALCK, as follows: The Commissioner’s decision denying the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits of Dianne M. Walck is AFFIRMED, in accordance with the court’s order (Doc. 17), dated August 8, 2017. This action was (check one): 9 tried by a jury with Judge or Magistrate Judge rendered a verdict. 9 tried by Judge or Magistrate Judge X decided by Judge or Magistrate Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF HHS DECISION (DIWC) Date: Aug 8, 2017 CLERK OF COURT PETER WELSH, Acting Clerk of Court K. McKinney Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?