Adams v. Giroux et al
Filing
73
ORDER & JUDGMENT ADOPTING REPORT 69 of Magistrate Judge Saporito, GRANTING deft's MSJ 60 , JUDGMENT is ENTERED in favor of defts & against pltf on all claims raised in pltf's pro se complaint, & Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE case. (See order/jdgmt for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/9/17. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TROY ADAMS,
Plaintiff
v.
NANCY A. GIROUX, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-1321
(Chief Judge Conner)
ORDER & JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of the
report (Doc. 69) of Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr., wherein Judge
Saporito recommends that the court grant defendants’ motion (Doc. 60) for
summary judgment and enter judgment in favor of all defendants and against
plaintiff Troy Adams (“Adams”) as to all claims asserted in Adams’ pro se civil
rights complaint (Doc. 1), and the court noting that Adams has objected (Doc. 72)
to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and, following a de novo review of the
contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep’t of Transp., 791 F. Supp. 2d
383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d
1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the
uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999),
the court finding Judge Saporito’s analysis to be thorough, well-reasoned, and
fully supported by the record, and finding Adams’ objection (Doc. 72) to be
without merit and squarely addressed by the report, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The report (Doc. 69) of Magistrate Judge Saporito is ADOPTED.
2.
Defendants’ motion (Doc. 60) for summary judgment is GRANTED.
3.
Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on
all claims raised in plaintiff’s pro se complaint.
4.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?