Atwell v. Lane et al
Filing
27
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 is DENIED.2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. SeeR. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 11(a) (stating that [t]he districtcourt must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters afinal order adverse to the applicant).3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. (eo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH WILLIAM ATWELL,
Petitioner,
v.
JAY LANE, ACTING
SUPERINTENDENT, PA
ATTORNEY GENERAL et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1:15-cv-1583
Hon. John E. Jones III
ORDER
July 11, 2017
NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas
corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and in accordance with the Court’s
Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 is DENIED.
2.
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See
R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 11(a) (stating that “[t]he district
court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a
final order adverse to the applicant”).
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
s/ John E. Jones III
John E. Jones III
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?