K.E. v. Dover Area School District et al
ORDER (Memorandum 92 filed previously as separate docket entry) DENYING District's MSJ 61 , GRANTING Lincoln's MSJ 64 , DEFERRING entry of jdgmt (re: Para 2) pending trial on remaining claims sub judice, & directing parties to meet & co nfer in consultation w/ ct's courtroom deputy w/ goal of devoping approp schedule for further proceedings & to submit joint prop pretrial & trial sched to ct by 10/16/17... (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/29/17. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DOVER AREA SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-1634
(Chief Judge Conner)
AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of the
motions (Docs. 61, 64) for summary judgment filed by defendants Dover Area
School District (“the District”) and Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 (“Lincoln”), and
for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby
The District’s motion (Doc. 61) for summary judgment is DENIED.
Lincoln’s motion (Doc. 64) for summary judgment is GRANTED.
Entry of judgment in accordance with paragraph 2 is DEFERRED
pending trial on the remaining claims sub judice.
The parties are directed to meet and confer, in consultation with the
undersigned’s courtroom deputy, with the goal of developing an
appropriate schedule for further proceedings. On or before Monday,
October 16, 2017, the parties shall submit to the court a joint proposed
pretrial and trial schedule, specifically identifying the anticipated
length of trial, or, in the event the parties are unable to agree, shall
submit individual proposed schedules for the court’s consideration.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?