Eckert et al v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union 776 Profit Sharing Plan et al
Filing
41
ORDER (Memorandum 40 filed previously as separate docket entry) DENYING defts' MSJ 31 & directing parties to meet & confer to devlop appropriate schedule for further proceedings & to submit joint proposed pretrial/trial schedule to ct by 4/3/17. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 3/13/17. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARIO ECKERT, ROBERT BAKER,
STEVE BILLET, KEVIN BLOOM,
JR., SHAWN CLARK, KAREN
DIETZ, HERBERT C. GARBER,
GISBEL GARCIA, JR., MARIO
GAROFALO, BRADLEY
HOCKENBERRY, MARTIN
PARSON, and FRED WILSON,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS AND
HELPERS LOCAL UNION 776
PROFIT SHARING PLAN,
CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS AND
HELPERS LOCAL UNION 776,
EDGAR H. THOMPSON, and
RONALD W. HICKS,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-CV-1920
(Chief Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2017, upon consideration of the motion
(Doc. 31) for summary judgment filed by defendants, and the parties’ respective
briefs in support of and opposition to said motion (Docs. 32, 35, 37), and for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The motion (Doc. 31) for summary judgment is DENIED.
2.
The parties are directed to meet and confer with the goal of developing
an appropriate schedule for further proceedings. On or before
Monday, April 3, 2017, the parties shall submit a joint proposed
pretrial and trial schedule to the court or, in the event the parties are
unable to agree, shall submit individual proposed schedules for the
court’s consideration.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?