Noye v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 84

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)- IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant Kelly Services Inc.s renewed motion 72 to compel arbitration and stay pending action is GRANTED, insofar as Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Kelly Service s, Inc. are stayed pending the outcome of arbitration of those claims. The parties are directed to file a joint status report informing the Court as to the result of the arbitration proceeding within thirty (30) days of its conclusion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT with regard to Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.s renewed motion 74 to compel arbitration and dismiss or, in the alternative, stay all proceedings the parties are directed to file additional briefing, specifically addressing the issue of the applicability of the theory of equitable estoppel to the motion in light of the Third Circuits recently-issued precedential opinion in White v. Sunoco, 870 F.3d 257 (3d Cir. 2017), as follows: 1. Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. shall file its brief by November 20, 2017; 2. Plaintiff T. Jason Noye shall file a responsive brief by December 4, 2017; and 3. Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. may file a reply brief, if any, byDecember 11, 2017. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 11/6/17. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA T JASON NOYE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON and KELLY SERVICES, INC., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : No. 1:15-cv-2382 (Judge Kane) ORDER AND NOW, on this 6th day of November 2017, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant Kelly Services Inc.’s renewed motion to compel arbitration and stay pending action (Doc. No. 72), is GRANTED, insofar as Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Kelly Services, Inc. are stayed pending the outcome of arbitration of those claims. The parties are directed to file a joint status report informing the Court as to the result of the arbitration proceeding within thirty (30) days of its conclusion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT with regard to Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.’s renewed motion to compel arbitration and dismiss or, in the alternative, stay all proceedings (Doc. No. 74), the parties are directed to file additional briefing, specifically addressing the issue of the applicability of the theory of equitable estoppel to the motion in light of the Third Circuit’s recently-issued precedential opinion in White v. Sunoco, 870 F.3d 257 (3d Cir. 2017), as follows: 1. Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. shall file its brief by November 20, 2017; 2. Plaintiff T. Jason Noye shall file a responsive brief by December 4, 2017; and 3. Defendant Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. may file a reply brief, if any, by December 11, 2017. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?