Boynton v. Ferguson et al
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 9 of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick, DISMISSING petition 1 for writ of habeas corpus w/out prejudice to Boynton's right to request leave from 3rd Cir Ct of Appeals to pursue 2nd or successive petition, finding no basis to issue certificate of appealability, & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 6/26/17. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BENJAMIN BOYNTON, JR.,
Petitioner
v.
WARDEN TAMMY FERGUSON,
et al.,
Respondents
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-449
(Chief Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc.
9) of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick, recommending the court dismiss the
petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus by pro se petitioner Benjamin Boynton, Jr.
(“Boynton”) as an unauthorized second or successive petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2244(b)(2), without prejudice to Boynton’s right to seek preauthorization from the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals to file same under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3), and the
court noting that Boynton objects to the report (Doc. 10), and, following a de novo
review of the contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep’t of Transp., 791
F. Supp. 2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3
(3d Cir. 1989); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)), and applying a clear error standard of review
to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa.
1999), the court being in agreement with Judge Mehalchick that Boynton’s instant
petition is an unauthorized second or successive petition filed without leave of the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)-(3), and finding Judge
Mehalchick’s analysis to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the
record, and further finding Boynton’s objection to be without merit,1 it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1.
The report (Doc. 9) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick is ADOPTED.
2.
The petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus by petitioner
Benjamin Boynton, Jr. (“Boynton”) is DISMISSED without prejudice
to Boynton’s right to request leave from the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals to pursue a second or successive petition pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) and (b)(3).
3.
The court finds no basis to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c); R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 11(a).
4.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
1
Boynton contends that Judge Mehalchick erred in examining his petition
without first ordering service of the petition on respondents and requesting an
answer therefrom. (See Doc. 10 ¶¶ 4-6). Judge Mehalchick complied to the letter
with the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, which require a court to “promptly examine”
petitions upon receipt and to dismiss any petition from which it “plainly appears . . .
that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.” R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 4. Only if
the petition is not dismissed must the court order a respondent to answer same. Id.
Judge Mehalchick did not err by conducting a preliminary review of Boynton’s
petition without soliciting an answer from respondents.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?