Picarella v. Brouse et al

Filing 106

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). The motion (Doc. 84) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. 3. Plaintiff's request (Doc. 81) that the court o rder defense counsel to comply with the Department of Corrections policy regarding incoming inmate mail is DISMISSED. 4. Plaintiff's request (Doc. 86) for judgment and sanctions based on defendant's and defense counsels purported nefarious conduct is DISMISSED. 5. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 99) for referral to alternative dispute resolution is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 1/14/2020. (ktt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARLES PICARELLA, JR., Plaintiff v. KRISTA BROUSE, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:16-CV-501 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of defendant’s motion (Doc. 84) for summary judgment, and in accordance with the memorandum issued this date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motion (Doc. 84) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. 3. Plaintiff’s request (Doc. 81) that the court order defense counsel to comply with the Department of Corrections’ policy regarding incoming inmate mail is DISMISSED. 4. Plaintiff’s request (Doc. 86) for judgment and sanctions based on defendant’s and defense counsel’s purported nefarious conduct is DISMISSED. 5. Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 99) for referral to alternative dispute resolution is DISMISSED. 6. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 7. Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?