Matcheson v. Colvin
Filing
13
JUDGMENT be & is hereby ENTERED in favor of deft Commissioner & against pltf Matcheson as follows: Decision of Commissioner dentyin app for disability ins benefits & supp'l security income of Matcheson AFFIRMED in acc w/ ct's order 12 of 9/6/17. (See jdgmt for complete details.)Signed by Deputy Clerk on 9/6/17. (ki)
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
MIDDLE DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA
TRACY LEE MATCHESON,
)
Plaintiff
)
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social
)
Civil Action No.
)
Security,
1:16-CV-0671
(Chief Judge Conner)
)
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
9
the plaintiff
defendant (name)
dollars ($
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
9
x
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
%, along with costs.
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
other:
JUDGMENT be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security, and against plaintiff TRACY MATCHESON, as follows: The decision of the Commissioner
decision denying the application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income of Tracy Lee
Matcheson is AFFIRMED, in accordance with the court’s order (Doc. 12), dated September 6, 2017.
This action was (check one):
9 tried by a jury with Judge or Magistrate Judge
rendered a verdict.
9
tried by Judge or Magistrate Judge
X
decided by Judge or Magistrate Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner
COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF HHS DECISION (SSID)
Date:
Sep 6, 2017
CLERK OF COURT PETER WELSH, Acting Clerk of Court
K. McKinney
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?