Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Angino Law Firm, P.C. et al

Filing 95

ORDER (Memorandum 94 filed previously as separate docket entry) DENYING defts' motions for "reconsideration en banc and/or a new trial 70 , for recusal 74 , to "reopen the dockets and remove judgments" 75 & to "strike and/or vacate judgments 85 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 5/9/19. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff v. ANGINO LAW FIRM, P.C., et al., Defendants BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff v. ANGINO LAW FIRM, P.C., et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-712 : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-713 (Chief Judge Conner) (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of defendants’ motions for “reconsideration en banc and/or a new trial,” (Doc. 70), for recusal, (Doc. 74), to “reopen the dockets and remove judgments,” (Doc. 75), and to “strike and/or vacate judgments,” (Doc. 85), 1 and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that said motions are DENIED. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania 1 Duplicate post-trial motions were filed in case numbers 1:16-CV-712 and 1:16-CV-713. The motions appear at identically numbered docket entries in each case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?