Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Angino Law Firm, P.C. et al
Filing
95
ORDER (Memorandum 94 filed previously as separate docket entry) DENYING defts' motions for "reconsideration en banc and/or a new trial 70 , for recusal 74 , to "reopen the dockets and remove judgments" 75 & to "strike and/or vacate judgments 85 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 5/9/19. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
COMPANY,
Plaintiff
v.
ANGINO LAW FIRM, P.C., et al.,
Defendants
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
COMPANY,
Plaintiff
v.
ANGINO LAW FIRM, P.C., et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-712
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-713
(Chief Judge Conner)
(Chief Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2019, upon consideration of defendants’
motions for “reconsideration en banc and/or a new trial,” (Doc. 70), for recusal, (Doc.
74), to “reopen the dockets and remove judgments,” (Doc. 75), and to “strike and/or
vacate judgments,” (Doc. 85), 1 and for the reasons stated in the accompanying
memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that said motions are DENIED.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
1
Duplicate post-trial motions were filed in case numbers 1:16-CV-712 and
1:16-CV-713. The motions appear at identically numbered docket entries in each
case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?