Williams v. Office of Vocational Rehabilitation et al

Filing 16

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that 1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 8) of MJ Mehalchick. 2. Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED. 3. This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick for further pretrial management. 3 8 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 1/10/17. SEE ORDER. (sc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NYGEA WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff
v.
OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL,
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

No. 1:16-cv-731
(Judge Kane)
(Magistrate Judge Mehalchick)

ORDER
THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
On November 18, 2016, Magistrate Judge Mehalchick issued a Report and
Recommendation in the above-captioned case recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for a
preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 3), be denied. (Doc. No. 8.) Objections to that Report and
Recommendation were due by December 5, 2016. On December 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed a onepage document entitled “Motion to Extend Time to Answer Denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for a
Preliminary Injunction to Amend Plaintiff’s Complaint; and a Motion for Permission to File on
Behalf of Six New Plaintiff’s Complaints All of Which Are to Be Related to Plaintiff’s, 16-CV00731-YK, Complaint and All of Which Seek to Be Filed Under Seal. Or In Camera Review
Prior to Being Docketed For Publication.” (Doc. No. 9.) The Court construed the document as a
motion for additional time to file objections to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick’s Report and
Recommendation, and granted the motion insofar as it sought additional time to file objections.
(Doc. No. 10.) Pursuant to the Court’s Order, objections to the Report and Recommendation
were due December 16, 2016.
On December 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Additional Time to Reply to

Magistrate Report and Recommendation.” (Doc. No. 11.) The Court again granted Plaintiff
additional time to file objections to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick’s Report and
Recommendation, setting the date of January 6, 2017 as the deadline for filing any objections to
the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. No. 13.) In that Order, however, the Court cautioned
Plaintiff that it would not entertain any further motions for extension of time to file objections to
the Report and Recommendation. No timely objections have been filed.
ACCORDINGLY, this 10th day of January 2017, upon consideration of the record and
applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 8) of Magistrate
Judge Mehalchick.

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED.

3.

This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick for further pretrial
management.

s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania