Labarge v. Maiorana et al
Filing
50
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. The motion (Doc. 22) to dismiss the FTCA claims is GRANTED.The FTCA claims against the United States are DISMISSED in theirentirety.2. The motion (Doc. 22) for summary judgment is GRANTED .3. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment against Plaintiffand in favor of Defendants Maiorana, Collis, Gellis, Getz, Grizzanti,Schwartz, Case, and Heneen.4. The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case.5. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (eo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRANDEN M. LABARGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN C. MAIORANA, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1:16-cv-1046
Hon. John E. Jones III
ORDER
September 18, 2017
NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of Defendants’ unopposed motion
(Doc. 22) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) and for
summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and in
accordance with the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1.
The motion (Doc. 22) to dismiss the FTCA claims is GRANTED.
The FTCA claims against the United States are DISMISSED in their
entirety.
2.
The motion (Doc. 22) for summary judgment is GRANTED.
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment against Plaintiff
and in favor of Defendants Maiorana, Collis, Gellis, Getz, Grizzanti,
Schwartz, Case, and Heneen.
4.
The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case.
5.
Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
s/ John E. Jones III
John E. Jones III
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?