Jones v. Tritt et al

Filing 48

ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 47 : 1. Dr. Pandya and CRNP Iannuzzis mtn to dismiss 25 is granted in part and denied in part.2. CRNP Iannuzzis mtn to dismiss Jones Eighth Amendment claims against him is granted.3. Dr. Pandyas mt n to dismiss Jones Eighth Amendment claim concerning the treatment of his sarcoidosis is denied.4. The DOC Dfts mtn for judgment on the pleadings 44 is granted.5. The sole surviving claim in this action lies against Dr. Pandya.6. Dr. Pandya is granted (21) days from the date of this order to file an answer to the Complaint. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 10/5/17. (ma)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BARRY JONES Plaintiff v. BRENDA TRITT, SUPERINTENDENT, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : Civil No. 1 :CV-16-1537 (Judge Caldwell) ORDER And now, this 5th day of October, 2017, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is ordered that: 1. Dr. Pandya and CRNP Iannuzzi’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 25) is granted in part and denied in part. 2. CRNP Iannuzzi’s motion to dismiss Jones’ Eighth Amendment claims against him is granted. 3. Dr. Pandya’s motion to dismiss Jones’ Eighth Amendment claim concerning the treatment of his sarcoidosis is denied. 4. The DOC Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 44) is granted. 5. The sole surviving claim in this action lies against Dr. Pandya. 6. Dr. Pandya is granted twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to file an answer to the Complaint. /s/ William W. Caldwell William W. Caldwell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?