Rothermel et al v. Dauphin County, Pennsylvania et al

Filing 35

ORDER denying defts' motion to stay discovery 30 pending disposition of defts' MTDs. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 1/18/17. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MELISSA LEE ROTHERMEL, et al., Plaintiffs v. DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1669 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of January, 2017, upon consideration of defendants’ motion (Doc. 30) to stay discovery pending disposition of defendants’ motions (Docs. 22, 25, 26) to dismiss, and the court concluding that a stay is inappropriate as the benefits of a stay do not outweigh the potential for harm to the parties, see 19th St. Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church, 190 F.R.D. 345, 349 (E.D. Pa. 2000) (citation omitted), it is hereby ORDERED that defendants’ motion (Doc. 30) is DENIED. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?