DIORIO v. HARRY et al
Filing
24
ORDER: 1. Judge Mehalchicks report and recommendation 23 is ADOPTED.2. Counts IV and V of the complaint 1 are DISMISSED. Leave to amend is granted.1 If Pltf desires to amend her complaint regarding Counts IV and V, she must do so within (14) days of the date of this order.3. This case is REMANDED to Judge Mehalchick for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 7/25/17. (ma)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DOMINIQUE DIORIO,
Plaintiff
v.
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL R.
HARRY, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
: CASE NO. 1:16-CV-1678
:
:
:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of the report and
recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick (Doc. 23), filed on June 5,
2017, to which no objections were filed, and upon independent review of the record, it is
ORDERED that:
1. Judge Mehalchick’s report is ADOPTED.
2. Counts IV and V of the complaint (Doc. 1) are DISMISSED. Leave to
amend is granted. 1 If Plaintiff desires to amend her complaint regarding
Counts IV and V, she must do so within fourteen (14) days of the date of
this order.
3. This case is REMANDED to Judge Mehalchick for further proceedings.
/s/ William W. Caldwell
William W. Caldwell
United States District Judge
1
See Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc., 482 F.3d 247, 251 (3d Cir. 2007)
(explaining that in civil rights cases, leave to amend—even if not requested—should be given
unless amendment would be futile or granting leave would be inequitable).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?