Gentzler v. Graham Packaging Co.
Filing
22
ORDER granting consent motion 21 for leave of court for pltf to file 2nd amended complaint, directing Clrk of Ct to file 2nd amended c/o 21 -2 submitted w/ pltf's motion, denying deft's MTD 19 as moot & w/out prejudice, & directing deft to respond to 2nd amended c/o in acc w/ FRCP. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/27/16. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KELI R. GENTZLER,
Plaintiff
v.
GRAHAM PACKAGING CO.,
Defendant
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1845
(Chief Judge Conner)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of the
consent motion (Doc. 21) for leave of court for plaintiff to file a second amended
complaint, and it appearing that the parties agree that plaintiff’s second amended
complaint will render null plaintiff’s first amended complaint (Doc. 14) and will
moot defendant’s pending motion (Doc. 19) to dismiss, (see Doc. 21 at 2), it is
hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The consent motion (Doc. 21) for leave of court for plaintiff to file a
second amended complaint is GRANTED.
2.
The Clerk of Court is directed to file the second amended complaint
(Doc. 21-2) submitted with plaintiff’s motion to the docket in the abovecaptioned matter.
3.
Defendant’s motion (Doc. 19) to dismiss is DENIED as moot and
without prejudice.
4.
Defendant shall respond to plaintiff’s second amended complaint in
accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?