Carusone v. Kane et al

Filing 127

ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 126 : Pltf Christopher Carusonesv mtn for summary judgment 101 is DENIED and Dfts mtn forsummary judgment 93 is GRANTED as to Dfts William Nemetz, David Peifer, Braden Cook, and Renee Martin and DENIED as to Dft Kathleen Kane.Carusones Equal Protection claims against Nemetz, Peifer, Cook, and Martinare DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/3/23. (ma)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER CARUSONE,
Plaintiff,
v.
KATHLEEN KANE et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

No. 1:16-CV-01944

Judge Sylvia H. Rambo

ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2023, upon consideration of the parties’
motions for summary judgment, and in accordance with the accompanying
memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Christopher Carusone’s
motion for summary judgment (Doc. 101) is DENIED and Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment (Doc. 93) is GRANTED as to Defendants William Nemetz,
David Peifer, Braden Cook, and Renee Martin and DENIED as to Defendant
Kathleen Kane.
Carusone’s Equal Protection claims against Nemetz, Peifer, Cook, and Martin
are DISMISSED with prejudice.
/s/ Sylvia H. Rambo
SYLVIA H. RAMBO
United States District Judge