WARTLUFT et al v. THE MILTON HERSHEY SCHOOL AND SCHOOL TRUST et al

Filing 217

ORDER (Memorandum 216 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pltfs prev dismissed tort claims REINSTATED as follows... (see Paras 1a-b for specifics); 2. If pltfs choose to amend they shall file 2nd amended compl aint w/in 14 days of date of this order... in absence of timely filed 2nd amended complaint action shall proceed on amended complaint in acc w/ accompanying memo; 3. Cts 8/10/17 memo & order 62 63 VACATED; 4. Defts motion for jdgmt on pleadings 119 & MSJ 158 DISMISSED w/out prejudice to rt to reinstitute & supp said motions @ request of parties; 5. Joint motion 215 in supp of stip to ext case mgmt ddls DISMISSED as moot... parties to meet & confer & file joint prop scheduling order amending current case mgmt ddls 171 by 12/28/18. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/7/18. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JULIE ELLEN WARTLUFT, et al., Plaintiffs v. THE MILTON HERSHEY SCHOOL, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-2145 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2018, upon reconsideration of our August 10, 2017 memorandum and order (Docs. 62, 63), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs’ previously dismissed tort claims are REINSTATED as follows: a. b. 2. Plaintiffs’ negligence (Count III), intentional infliction of emotional distress as to Abrielle (Count IX), negligent infliction of emotional distress (Count X), civil conspiracy to endanger children (Count XI), and breach of fiduciary duties of care and good faith (Count XII) in the amended complaint are REINSTATED. Plaintiffs’ negligent misrepresentation (Count VII), intentional misrepresentation (Count VIII), and intentional infliction of emotional distress as to plaintiffs (Count IX) are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). If Plaintiffs choose to amend, they shall file a second amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, consistent with the above paragraph and the accompanying memorandum. In the absence of a timely filed second amended complaint, the above-captioned action shall proceed on the amended complaint in accordance with the accompanying memorandum. 3. The court’s August 10, 2017 memorandum and order (Docs. 62, 63) are VACATED. 4. Defendants’ motion (Doc. 119) for judgment on the pleadings and motion (Doc. 158) for summary judgment are DISMISSED without prejudice to the right to reinstitute and supplement said motions at the request of the parties. 5. The parties’ joint motion (Doc. 215) in support of their stipulation to extend case management deadlines is DISMISSED as moot. In light of the memorandum and order of today’s date, the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint proposed scheduling order amending the current case management deadlines, (see Doc. 171), on or before Friday, December 28, 2018. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?