Rosa-Diaz v. Harry et al

Filing 63

ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 62 ; 1) The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED;2) The mtn to dismiss filed by Dft Woods 43 is GRANTED;3) The Correctional Dfdts mtn to dismiss 40 is GRANTED, in part, an d all of the dfts and claims are dismissed, with the exception of a due process claim against Dfts Dempsey and Rost relating solely to the alleged confiscation of Curious Moments Archive of the Century.4) The parties shall have until 4/30/18 to complete discovery.5) The dispositive mtns ddl is 5/21/18.6) This matter is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/1/18. (ma)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. LAUREL HARRY, et al., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Civil No. 1:16-cv-2303 Judge Sylvia H. Rambo ORDER AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2018, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1) The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED; 2) The motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Woods (Doc. 43) is GRANTED; 3) The Correctional Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 40) is GRANTED, in part, and all of the defendants and claims are dismissed, with the exception of a due process claim against Defendants Dempsey and Rost relating solely to the alleged confiscation of “Curious Moments Archive of the Century.” 4) The parties shall have until April 30, 2018 to complete discovery. 5) The dispositive motions deadline is May 21, 2018. 6) This matter is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. s/Sylvia H. Rambo SYLVIA H. RAMBO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?