Walker v. Ebbert et al
Filing
75
ORDER (Memorandum 74 filed previously as separate docket entry) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts' MSJ 61 GRANTED in favor of Defts Alama, Beachel, Ebbert, Fasciana, Good, Heim, Hess, Hughes, MOttern, Pigos & White & against pltf for fa ilure to exhaust admin remedies - Jdgmt entered in favor of Defts & against Pltf.; 2. Pltf's motion for default jdgmt 72 DENIED.; 3. Lt. Jason Seeba DISMISSED w/out prejudice pursuant to FRCP 4(m).; 4. Clrk of Ct directed to TERMINATE C.O. A. Simmons & Dr. Steven Skalka from action.; 5. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE case.; 6. Any appeal from this order DEEMED frivolous & not in good faith... (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/1/18. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CEDRIC TYRONE WALKER,
Plaintiff
v.
WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT,
et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 1:16-cv-02387
(Judge Rambo)
ORDER
AND NOW, on this 1st day of August 2018, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 61), is
GRANTED in favor of Defendants Alama, Beachel, Ebbert, Fasciana,
Good, Heim, Hess, Hughes, Mottern, Pigos, and White, and against
Plaintiff for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Judgment is
entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff;
2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 72), is DENIED;
3. Lt. Jason Seeba is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m);
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE C.O. A. Simmons and
Dr. Steven Skalka from this action;
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case; and
6. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
s/Sylvia H. Rambo
SYLVIA H. RAMBO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?