JOHNSON v. WINGARD et al

Filing 21

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. The petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See 28U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. (eo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents. : : : : : : : : : : 1:17-cv-0068 Hon. John E. Jones III ORDER July 18, 2017 NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). 2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. s/ John E. Jones III John E. Jones III United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?