JOHNSON v. WINGARD et al
Filing
21
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)1. The petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See 28U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. (eo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT JOHNSON,
Petitioner,
v.
WARDEN WINGARD, THE
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE
COUNTY OF DAUPHIN, PA
STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1:17-cv-0068
Hon. John E. Jones III
ORDER
July 18, 2017
NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and for the reasons set forth in the
Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See 28
U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3).
2.
A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
s/ John E. Jones III
John E. Jones III
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?