WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
Filing
51
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 50 ; 1. Pltfs mtn for release from SMU 40 is DENIED;2. Pltfs mtn for leave to file an amended complaint 42 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall DOCKET the second amended complaint [63-1] as a sep arate entry on the docket of this action. Dfts shall answer or otherwise respond to the second amended complaint in accordance with the requirements set forth in the FRCP and the LRs of this Court. Pltf, in accord with Rule 4 of the FRCP, shall make arrangements to effect service of the second amended complaint on the newly added Dft as required by the Rules of this Court;3. Pltfs motion seeking service forms 43 is GRANTED insofar as the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide Pltf with the appr opriate forms to serve the newly added Dft;4. Dfts mtn to dismiss 23 is DENIED without prejudice as moot;5. Pltfs mtn for an exttm to file a bropp to Dfts mtn to dismiss 44 is DENIED as moot; and6. Pltfs mtn for a preliminary injunction 48 ) is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 9/26/17. (ma)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff
vs.
JOHN WETZEL, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 1:17-CV-00079
(Judge Rambo)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 23) and brief in support (Doc. No. 28),
and Plaintiff’s motion for release from SMU (Doc. No. 40); motion for leave to file
an amended complaint (Doc. No. 42); “motion” (Doc. No. 43); motion for an
extension of time to file a brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss
(Doc. No. 44); and motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 48), IT IS
ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff’s motion for release from SMU (Doc. No. 40) is DENIED for
the same reasons as set forth in this Court’s July 18, 2017 Memorandum
and Order (Doc. Nos. 32, 33);
2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 42) is
GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall DOCKET the second amended
complaint (Doc. No. 43-1) as a separate entry on the docket of this
action. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the second
amended complaint in accordance with the requirements set forth in the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court.
1
Plaintiff, in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, shall make arrangements to effect service of the second
amended complaint on the newly added Defendant as required by the
Rules of this Court;
3. Plaintiff’s “motion” seeking service forms (Doc. No. 43) is GRANTED
insofar as the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with the
appropriate forms to serve the newly added Defendant;
4. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 23) is DENIED without
prejudice as moot;
5. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a brief in opposition to
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 44) is DENIED as moot; and
6. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 48) is DENIED.
s/Sylvia H. Rambo
SYLVIA H. RAMBO
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?