Fortunato et al v. CGA Law Firm et al

Filing 18

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants CGA Law Firm and Margaret Driscolls motion 7 to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Count I of the Complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 2. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 7/24/17. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHRYN FORTUNATO, et al., Plaintiffs v. CGA LAW FIRM, and MARGARET DRISCOLL, Defendants : : : : : : : : No. 1:17-cv-00201 (Judge Kane) ORDER AND NOW, on this 24th day of July 2017, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants CGA Law Firm and Margaret Driscoll’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 7), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Count I of the Complaint (Doc. No. 1), is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 2. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. S/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?