Montalban v. Powell et al

Filing 68

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING Dfts' 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Dfts and CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 1/15/19. (sm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSÉ MONTALBAN, Plaintiff v. MR. POWEL, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : No. 1:17cv212 (Judge Munley) ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ORDER AND NOW, to wit, this 15th day of January 2019, upon consideration of the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 44) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motion (Doc. 44) for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Brennan, Wisniewski, Pedone, Powell, Verbyla, Moddruff, Vrabel, Glossenger, Snee, Burgenhoff, Dobushak, Cook, Gintz, Johanson, Mazza, Tuttle, Kabonick and Schultz and against Montalban. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT: s/James M. Munley JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?