Montalban v. Powell et al
Filing
68
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING Dfts' 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment; Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Dfts and CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 1/15/19. (sm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSÉ MONTALBAN,
Plaintiff
v.
MR. POWEL, et al.,
Defendants
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 1:17cv212
(Judge Munley)
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
ORDER
AND NOW, to wit, this 15th day of January 2019, upon consideration of the
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 44) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 56, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum of the same date,
it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ motion (Doc. 44) for summary judgment is
GRANTED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of
Defendants Brennan, Wisniewski, Pedone, Powell, Verbyla,
Moddruff, Vrabel, Glossenger, Snee, Burgenhoff, Dobushak,
Cook, Gintz, Johanson, Mazza, Tuttle, Kabonick and Schultz and
against Montalban.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
s/James M. Munley
JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?