Pinson v. United States et al

Filing 41

ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 40 ; 1. Pltfs mtn for exttm 33 , is GRANTED to the extent that Pltf is afforded (30) days in which to obtain an affidavit from former cellmate Timothy Beckwith andpsychologist Richard Samuels;2. Bri efing on Dfts mtn for summary judgment is STAYED in accordance with the ddls prescribed by this Order below;3. Pltfs unopposed mtn for an exttm in which to file a bropp to Dfts mtn for summary judgment (Doc. No. 33) is GRANTED to the extent that Pltf shall file a bropp to Dfts mtn for summary judgment, together with a counterstatement of facts by 2/7/18;4. Dfts shall be permitted to file a reply brief in further support oftheir mtn for summary judgment on or before 2/22/18;5. No further briefing on the mtn for summary judgment shall be permitted without leave of Court; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:6. Pltfs mtn to appoint counsel 36 , is DENIED; and7. Pltfs mtn for a preliminary injunction 38 , is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 11/7/17. (ma)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JEREMY V. PINSON,
Plaintiff
vs.
UNITED STATES, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

No. 1:17-CV-00584
(Judge Rambo)

ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of
Plaintiff’s motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(d) and motion for extension of time
in which to file a brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
(Doc. No. 33), and brief in support (Doc. No. 34), Defendants’ brief in opposition
(Doc. No. 35), and Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 36), brief in
support (Doc. No. 37), and Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc.
No. 38), and brief in support (Doc. No. 39), and in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff’s motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(d) (Doc. No. 33), is
GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff is afforded thirty (30) days in
which to obtain an affidavit from former cellmate Timothy Beckwith and
psychologist Richard Samuels;
2. Further briefing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is
STAYED in accordance with the deadlines prescribed by this Order
below;

3. Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an extension of time in which to file a
brief in opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc.
No. 33) is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff shall file a brief in
opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, together with a
counterstatement of facts pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 on or before
Wednesday, February 7, 2018;
4. Defendants shall be permitted to file a reply brief in further support of
their motion for summary judgment on or before Tuesday, February 22,
2018;
5. No further briefing on the motion for summary judgment shall be
permitted without leave of Court;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
6. Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 36), is DENIED without
prejudice; and
7. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 38), is
DENIED.

s/Sylvia H. Rambo
SYLVIA H. RAMBO
United States District Judge

2