Reid v. Daniels et al

Filing 47

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 - Before the court is a report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge in which he recommends that Plaintiff Kenneth Reids original complaint (Doc. 1), partial amended complaint (Doc. 9), and ame nded complaint (Doc. 19) be dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed. Upon review of the reportand recommendation, the court finds that Plaintiffs failure to comply with thecourt orders shall result in dismissal of the complaints with prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1) The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. 2) The original complaint (Doc. 1), partial amended complaint (Doc. 9) and amended complaint (Doc. 19) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/1/18. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : KENNETH ROSHAUN REID, Plaintiff, v. C. DANIELS, et al., Defendant. Civil No. 1:17-cv-0694 Judge Sylvia H. Rambo ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge in which he recommends that Plaintiff Kenneth Reid’s original complaint (Doc. 1), partial amended complaint (Doc. 9), and amended complaint (Doc. 19) be dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed. Upon review of the report and recommendation, the court finds that Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court orders shall result in dismissal of the complaints with prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1) The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. 2) The original complaint (Doc. 1), partial amended complaint (Doc. 9) and amended complaint (Doc. 19) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. s/Sylvia H. Rambo SYLVIA H. RAMBO United States District Judge Dated: February 1, 2018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?