Ricciardi v. Schumencky et al
Filing
30
JUDGMENT - SUMMARY JUDGMENT be & is hereby ENTERED in favor of defts Lt. Schumencky, Lt. Woods, Supt. Vincent Mooney, CORG Wright, CO Knight, Lt. Geisinger & Capt. Shoemaker against pltf Christopher P. Ricciardi in acc w/ ct's memo & order 28 29 . (See jdgmt for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 3/12/18. (ki)
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
MIDDLE DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER P. RICCIARDI,
)
Plaintiff
v.
)
LT. SCHUMENCKY, LT. WOODS, SUPERNTENDENT
)
VINCENT MOONEY, C.O.R.J. WRIGHT, C.O. KNIGHT, LT.
)
GEISINGER and CAPT. SHOEMAKER,
)
Civil Action No.
1:17-CV-0719
(Chief Judge Conner)
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
9
the plaintiff
defendant (name)
dollars ($
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
9
x
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
%, along with costs.
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
other:
SUMMARY JUDGMENT be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of defendants LT. SCHUMENCKY, LT.
WOODS, SUPERNTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY, C.O.R.J. WRIGHT, C.O. KNIGHT, LT. GEISINGER and
CAPT. SHOEMAKER, and against plaintiff CHRISTOPHER P. RICCIARDI, in accordance with the court’s
memorandum and order (Docs. 28, 29), dated March 12, 2018.
This action was (check one):
9 tried by a jury with Judge or Magistrate Judge
rendered a verdict.
9
tried by Judge or Magistrate Judge
X
decided by Judge or Magistrate Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Date:
Mar 12, 2018
CLERK OF COURT PETER WELSH, Acting Clerk of Court
K. McKinney
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?