Pichardo v. Lowe et al
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 9 of Magistrate JudgeMehalchick 2.Petitioner Cristian Rosario Pichardos petition for writ 1 of habeas corpuspursuant to 28 U.S.C. 7; 2241 is GRANTED; 3.Petitioner shall be afforded an individualized bond hearing before animmigration judge within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, inaccordance with the dictates of the United States Court of Appeals for theThird Circuits decision in Chavez-Alvarez v. Warden York County Prison,783 F.3d 469, 478 (3d Cir. 2015); and 4.The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/30/17. (rw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CRISTIAN ROSARIO PICHARDO,
Petitioner
v.
CRAIG LOWE, et al.,
Respondents
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 1:17-cv-00770
(Judge Kane)
(Magistrate Judge Mehalchick)
ORDER
Before the Court is the May 24, 2017 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Mehalchick. (Doc. No. 9.) No timely objections have been filed. ACCORDINGLY, on this
30th day of June 2017, upon independent review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS
ORDERED THAT:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
Mehalchick (Doc. No. 9);
2. Petitioner Cristian Rosario Pichardo’s petition for writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1), is GRANTED;
3. Petitioner shall be afforded an individualized bond hearing before an
immigration judge within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, in
accordance with the dictates of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit’s decision in Chavez-Alvarez v. Warden York County Prison,
783 F.3d 469, 478 (3d Cir. 2015); and
4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.
s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?