Hagan v. Wetzel et al
ORDER (Memorandum 6 filed previously as separate docket entry) construing motion to proceed IFP 2 as motion to proceed w/out full prepymt of fees & costs & GRANTING same, directing pltf to file amended complaint by 6/7/17, setting forth specific instructions re: content of amended complaint (see Paras 3 & 4 for details)& noting failure to file amended complaint w/in specified time period will result in dismissal of action for failure to comply w/ order of ct. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 5/19/17. (ki)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN WETZEL, TABB BICKELL,
STEVE GLUNT, ROBERT MARSH,
LYNN PATRONE, ERIC TICE,
CHISM, ASHLEY SHOPE,
CIVIL NO. 1:17-CV-844
(Chief Judge Conner)
AND NOW, this 19th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff’s
complaint, and for the reasons set forth in the court’s memorandum of the same
date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is construed as a
motion to proceed without full prepayment of fees and costs and is
Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before June 7, 2017.
The amended complaint shall contain the same case number that is
already assigned to this action, 1:17-CV-844, and shall be direct,
concise, and shall stand alone without reference to any other
document filed in this matter. See FED. R. CIV. P. 8(e).
Plaintiff is strictly cautioned that the inclusion of separate, unrelated
claims will be considered a failure to comply with an order of court and
will result in dismissal of the complaint. See FED. R. CIV. P. 20.
Failure to file an amended complaint within the specified time period
will result in dismissal of the action for failure to comply with an order
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?