Sears v. McCoy et al

Filing 73

ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 72 : 1. Pltfs surviving First Amendment retaliation claims against Dft Dante McCoy (Defendant McCoy) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of Dft McCoy and against Pltf on Pltfs state law tort claims, see (Doc. No. 62 1(b)); and3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 11/30/23. (ma)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARD SEARS,
Plaintiff
v.
DANTE MCCOY, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

No. 1:17-cv-00869
(Judge Kane)

ORDER
AND NOW, on this 30th day of November 2023, upon consideration of the docket in the
above-captioned action, which reflects Plaintiff Richard Sears (“Plaintiff”)’s failure to prosecute,
and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff’s surviving First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendant Dante
McCoy (“Defendant McCoy”) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant
to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b);

2.

The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant
McCoy and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s state law tort claims, see (Doc. No. 62
¶ 1(b)); and

3.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

s/ Yvette Kane
Yvette Kane, District Judge
United States District Court
Middle District of Pennsylvania