Decker v. Berryhill
Filing
22
JUDGMENT be & is hereby ENTERED in favor of p;tf Dwight W. Decker & against Nancy A. Berryhill "the Commissioner," as follows: Commissioner's decision VACATED & matter REMANDED to Commissioner w/ instructions to conduct new admin hearing, develop record fully & evaluate evidence appropriately in acc w/ ct's order 21 & report 18 of Magistrate Judge. (See jdgmt for complete details.) Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/31/18. (ki)
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
MIDDLE DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA
)
DWIGHT W. DECKER,
Plaintiff
)
v.
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Civil Action No.
)
3:17-CV-0945
(Chief Judge Conner)
)
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
9
the plaintiff
defendant (name)
dollars ($
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
interest at the rate of
9
x
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
%, along with costs.
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
other:
JUDGMENT be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of plaintiff DWIGHT W. DECKER, and against defendant,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL “the Commissioner,” as follows: The Commissioner’s decision is VACATED and this
matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop
the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order (Doc. 21) and the report
[18] of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick.
This action was (check one):
9 tried by a jury with Judge or Magistrate Judge
rendered a verdict.
9
tried by Judge or Magistrate Judge
X
decided by Judge or Magistrate Judge
presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision
Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner
COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF HHS DECISION (SSID)
Date:
Aug 31, 2018
CLERK OF COURT PETER WELSH, Acting Clerk of Court
K. McKinney
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?