Singleton v. Shearer et al
Filing
106
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 105 ) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants motion (Doc. 93) for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Shearer, Mille r and Pilosi (now known as Walter) on all claims contained in the Amended Complaint (Doc. 24), and against Plaintiff. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 4. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 7/25/19. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALBERT SINGLETON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
SHEARER, JR., et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1:17-cv-1027
Hon. John E. Jones III
ORDER
July 25, 2019
NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion (Doc. 93)
for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and for the
reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ motion (Doc. 93) for summary judgment is GRANTED.
2.
The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of
Defendants Shearer, Miller and Pilosi (now known as Walter) on all
claims contained in the Amended Complaint (Doc. 24), and
against Plaintiff.
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
4.
Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
s/ John E. Jones
John E. Jones III
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?