Singleton v. Shearer et al

Filing 106

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 105 ) - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants motion (Doc. 93) for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Shearer, Mille r and Pilosi (now known as Walter) on all claims contained in the Amended Complaint (Doc. 24), and against Plaintiff. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 4. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 7/25/19. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALBERT SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHEARER, JR., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : 1:17-cv-1027 Hon. John E. Jones III ORDER July 25, 2019 NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion (Doc. 93) for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motion (Doc. 93) for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Shearer, Miller and Pilosi (now known as Walter) on all claims contained in the Amended Complaint (Doc. 24), and against Plaintiff. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 4. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). s/ John E. Jones John E. Jones III United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?