Given et al v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.

Filing 117

ORDER (Memorandum 116 filed previously as separate docket entry) granting in part & denying in part deft's motion 63 for sanctions, DISMISSING pltf Zachary Given's claim against deft Loves, directing Clrk of Ct to terminate pltf Zachary Given as party, directing pltfs' cnsl to pay $1,028.68 in costs to deft & otherwise denying deft's motion 63 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 5/22/18. (ki)

Download PDF
  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ZACHARY GIVEN, KRISTOPHER LAWSON, VINCENT MCCLEERY, and SEAN MCMURRAN, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. LOVE’S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC., Defendant : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-1266 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2018, upon consideration of defendant’s motion (Doc. 63) for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 against plaintiff Zachary Given and his attorneys, and the motion having been fully briefed, (Docs. 67, 80, 107, 108), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s motion (Doc. 63) for sanctions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 2. Plaintiff Zachary Given’s claim against defendant Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. is DISMISSED. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate plaintiff Zachary Given as a party to the above-captioned action. 4. Plaintiffs’ counsel shall pay the sum of $1,028.68 in costs to defendant.   5. Defendant’s motion (Doc. 63) for sanctions is otherwise DENIED. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?