Dougherty et al v. Dupes et al

Filing 149

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - all defendants having been dismissed from this action, all remaining pending motions are denied as moot and the clerk is ordered to mark this case closed. (See order for details)Signed by Honorable Joy Flowers Conti on 08/15/2018. (jw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEITH DOUGHERTY, et. al, Plaintiffs, v. JARED DUPES, et. al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:17-CV-01541-JFC ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2018, in accordance with the foregoing memorandum opinion, and upon consideration of the motion of plaintiff Keith Dougherty (“plaintiff”) for joinder (ECF No. 9) and the document docketed by plaintiff as “Supplemental JOINDER COMPLAINT,” that is in actuality a copy of a “Motion for Reconsideration and En Banc Panel Review” previously filed in a matter before the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, (ECF No. 36), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for joinder of “Senior Judge Robreno of the ED PA, along with the ED Chief Clerk Philadelphia Office, Chief Judge Simandle of the NJ District Court, the Deputy Clerk in Charge of the Camden District Court Defendants; Judge Kramer, Judge Schweitzer, and Judge Ragonese of the ‘NJ Superior Court” as defendants (ECF No. 9) IS DENIED, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the document docketed by plaintiff at ECF No. 36 as “Supplemental JOINDER COMPLAINT” IS STRICKEN to the extent plaintiff contends it to be a joinder complaint, and FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that all defendants having been dismissed from this action, all 1 remaining pending motions are denied as moot and the clerk is ordered to mark this case closed. By the court: /s/ Joy Flowers Conti Joy Flowers Conti United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?