Gutierrez Flores v. Doll
Filing
7
ORDER: 1. The petn for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 1 is DENIED without prejudice to Petr filing another § 2241 petn should he develop good reason to believe that removal is no longer reasonably foreseeable.2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 11/16/17. (ma)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DAVID ALEXANDER
GUTIERREZ FLORES,
Petitioner
vs.
CLAIRE DOLL,
Respondent
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 1:17-CV-01717
(Judge Rambo)
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2017, for the reasons set forth in
this Court’s accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(Doc. No. 1) is DENIED without prejudice to Petitioner filing another §
2241 petition should he develop good reason to believe that removal is no
longer reasonably foreseeable.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
s/Sylvia Rambo
SYLVIA H. RAMBO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?