Brown v. Edinger et al
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 11 ; 1. Pltfs mtns to proceed ifp 6 and 8 , are DENIED;2. Pltfs complaint 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice;3. Pltfs mton to file Bivens/Supplement 2 and mtn to Add & Amend Supplement Complaint 3 are DENIED as moot; and4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 12/4/17. (ma)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH A. BROWN,
MATT EDINGER, et al.,
AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2017, in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 6 and 8), are
2. Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice
pursuant to the three-strikes provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);
3. Plaintiff’s motion to file “Bivens/Supplement” (Doc. No. 2) and motion
to “Add & Amend Supplement Complaint” (Doc. No. 3) are DENIED as
4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
s/Sylvia H. Rambo
SYLVIA H. RAMBO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?