Smalls v. Sassaman et al

Filing 8

ORDER DISMISSING action without prejudice & directing Clrk of Ct to close this file. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 1/16/18. (ki)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: Smalls v. Sassaman, et al Inmate: Basheem Smalls ID: 55719-054 : : : : : Civil Action No. 1:17-CV-2237 (CHIEF JUDGE CONNER) ORDER On December 6, 2017, the individual listed above, filed the above civil rights complaint without submitting a filing fee or the proper mandatory financial forms required to proceed in forma pauperis1. (Doc. 1). By Administrative Order dated December 8, 2017, the Plaintiff was informed that this case would be dismissed, without prejudice, unless within thirty (30) days, he either paid the statutory filing fee of $400.00 or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis and an Authorization form. An application to proceed in forma pauperis and an Authorization form were enclosed with the Order. (Doc. 5). On December 29, 2018, plaintiff submitted the application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 6). However, to date he has failed to submit the Authorization form. More than thirty (30) days have elapsed and the Plaintiff has neither made an appropriate submissions, nor has he requested an additional extension of time in which to pay the filing fee or to submit the appropriate financial forms. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT this action is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court shall close this file. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania Dated: January 16, 2018 1. Although plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2), this is not the correct form for civil rights matters and he failed to submit an Authorization form.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?