Elanany v. Doll

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 as MOOT & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 5/24/18. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HASSAN ELANANY, Petitioner v. WARDEN CLAIR DOLL, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:17-CV-2405 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of May, 2018, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1), wherein petitioner, Hassan Elanany, challenges the constitutionality of his prolonged detention by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), and upon further consideration of respondent’s suggestion of mootness indicating that petitioner was deported from the United States on May 16, 2018, see (Doc. 12; Doc. 12-1, Warrant of Removal/ Deportation), and is no longer in ICE custody, which renders the petition moot, see Khodara Envtl., Inc. ex rel. Eagle Envtl., L.P. v. Beckman, 237 F.3d 186, 192-93 (3d Cir. 2001) (“Article III of the Constitution grants the federal courts the power to adjudicate only actual, ongoing cases or controversies.”); Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as moot. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?