Jubilee v. Berdanier et al

Filing 34

JUDGMENT - Summary jdgmt be & is hereby entered in favor of defts Gene Berdanier, David Wapinsky, George Halcovage, Gary Hess, Frank Staudemaier, William Baldwin, Joseph Grody & Christine Holman & against pltf William D. Jubilee, Sr., in acc w/ ct's memo & order 32 33 dated 1/24/19. (See jdgmt for complete details.)Signed by Deputy Clerk on 1/24/19. (ki)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the MIDDLE DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM D. JUBILEE, SR., ) Plaintiff ) v. GENE BERDANIER, DAVID WAPINSKY, GEORGE HALCOVAGE, GARY HESS, FRANK STAUDEMAIER, ) 1:18-CV-0052 ) WILLIAM BALDWIN, JOSEPH GRODY and CHRISTINE Civil Action No. ) (Chief Judge Conner) HOLMAN, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): 9 the plaintiff defendant (name) dollars ($ %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of 9 x recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment %, along with costs. the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . other: SUM MARY JUDGMENT be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of defendants GENE BERDANIER, DAVID WAPINSKY, GEORGE HALCOVAGE, GARY HESS, FRANK STAUDEMAIER, WILLIAM BALDWIN, JOSEPH GRODY and CHRISTINE HOLMAN, and against plaintiff WILLIAM D. JUBILEE, SR., in accordance with the court’s memorandum (Doc. 32) and order (Doc. 33), dated January 24, 2019. This action was (check one): 9 tried by a jury with Judge or Magistrate Judge rendered a verdict. 9 tried by Judge or Magistrate Judge X decided by Judge or Magistrate Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Date: Jan 24, 2019 CLERK OF COURT PETER WELSH, Acting Clerk of Court K. McKinney Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?