Pinson v. United States of America

Filing 38

ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 37 : 1.Dfts mtn for summary judgment 22 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:a. GRANTED with respect to Pltfs negligence claim concerning the nurse because Pltf failed to exhaust his administrative remedies withrespect to that claim;b. GRANTED with respect to Pltfs negligence claim concerning the officer who provided him a razor;c. DENIED with respect to Pltfs negligence claim alleging that on 6/5/16, an officer failed to retrieve a razor and contact psychology despite Pltfs statement that she was suicidal; and2. A separate Order setting forth further proceedings in the above-captioned case will issue. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/29/19. (ma)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEREMY PINSON, Plaintiff : : : v. : : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Defendant : No. 1:18-CV-0118 (Judge Rambo) ORDER AND NOW, on this 29th day of August 2019, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum accompanying this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. b. The motion (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s negligence claim concerning the officer who provided him a razor; c. 2. The motion (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s negligence claim concerning the nurse because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to that claim; The motion (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s negligence claim alleging that on June 5, 2016, an officer failed to retrieve a razor and contact psychology despite Plaintiff’s statement that she was suicidal; and A separate Order setting forth further proceedings in the abovecaptioned case will issue. S/SYLVIA H. RAMBO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?