Cramer v. Superintendent, SCI Coal Township et al

Filing 6

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), IT IS ORDERED THAT Cramers motions 2 , 4 to proceed in forma pauperis, are GRANTED for the sole purpose of initiating the above-captioned action, and Cramers Motion Under Rule 60(b) (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 3/12/18. (rw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DERRICK CRAMER, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI COAL TOWSNHIP, et al., Respondents : : : : : : : : No. 1:18-cv-00396 (Judge Kane) ORDER AND NOW, on this 12th day of March 2018, upon consideration of Derrick Cramer’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. Nos. 2, 4), and “Motion Under Rule 60(b)” (Doc. No. 1), IT IS ORDERED THAT Cramer’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. Nos. 2, 4), are GRANTED for the sole purpose of initiating the above-captioned action, and Cramer’s “Motion Under Rule 60(b)” (Doc. No. 1), is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. s/ Yvette Kane____________ Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?