Ray v. Berryhill

Filing 21

JUDGMENT - Jdgmt be & is hereby ENTERED in favor of pltf Barbara Ann Ray & against deft Commissioner, as follows: Commissioner's decision VACATED & matter REMANDED to Commissioner w/ instructions to conduct new admin hearing, develop record fully & evaluate evidence appropriately in acc w/ ct's order 20 & report 19 of Magistrate Judge Carlson. (See jdgmt for complete details.) Signed by Deputy Clerk on 3/21/19. (ki)

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the MIDDLE DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA ) BARBARA ANN RAY, Plaintiff ) v. ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Civil Action No. ) 1:18-CV-0567 (Chief Judge Conner) ) Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): 9 the plaintiff defendant (name) dollars ($ %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of 9 x recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment %, along with costs. the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . other: JUDGMENT be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of plaintiff BARBARA ANN RAY, and against defendant, NANCY A. BERRYHILL “the Commissioner,” as follows: The Commissioner’s decision is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order (Doc. 20) and the report (Doc. 19) of Magistrate Judge Carlson. This action was (check one): 9 tried by a jury with Judge or Magistrate Judge rendered a verdict. 9 tried by Judge or Magistrate Judge X decided by Judge or Magistrate Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner COMPLAINT FOR REVIEW OF HHS DECISION (DIWC) Date: Mar 21, 2019 CLERK OF COURT PETER WELSH, Acting Clerk of Court K. McKinney Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?