Barlow, et al v. Ebbert et al

Filing 90

ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 89 ; 1. Pltfs mtn for a TRO and PI 2 ), is DENIED;2. Pltf Wilsons mtn pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 63 , is DENIED as moot;3. Pltf Raileys mtn for leave to file an amended complaint 65 , is DENIED without prejudice;4. Pltf Raileys mtn for reconsideration 68 , is DENIED;5. Pltf Raileys mtn to sever party from action 81 , is GRANTED as follows:a. The claims of Pltf Nathan Railey will proceed under this matter, No. 18-cv-716;b. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to open the claims of Pltfs Camden Barlow, Christopher Alvarez, Terrell Wilson, Doreteo Garcia, and Juan C. Valles in new, individual actions. The original filing date of Pltfs claims will be preserved; c. The complaint (Do c. No. 1), the respective prisoner authorization forms and administrative orders (Doc. Nos. 10, 20, 22, 34, 37, 43-45, 47, 48), waivers of service forms (Doc. Nos. 40, 55), and copy of this Memorandum and Order will be docketed in each individual Plt fs action;d. Each Pltf shall file an amended complaint within (30) days from the date of this Order. If a Pltf fails to file an amended complaint within the time prescribed herein, the Court will direct Dfts to respond to the remaining FirstAmendment mail interference/enhancement claim as set forth in the original complaint (Doc. No. 1); and6. Dfts mtn to stay the proceedings 83 , is DENIED as moot.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/10/18. (ma)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAMDEN BARLOW, et al., Plaintiffs v. WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : No. 1:18-cv-00716 (Judge Rambo) ORDER AND NOW, on this 10th day of October 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 2), is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff Wilson’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 (Doc. No. 63), is DENIED as moot; 3. Plaintiff Railey’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 65), is DENIED without prejudice; 4. Plaintiff Railey’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 68), is DENIED; 5. Plaintiff Railey’s motion to sever party from action (Doc. No. 81), is GRANTED as follows: a. The claims of Plaintiff Nathan Railey will proceed under this matter, No. 18-cv-716; b. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to open the claims of Plaintiffs Camden Barlow, Christopher Alvarez, Terrell Wilson, Doreteo Garcia, and Juan C. Valles in new, individual actions. The original filing date of Plaintiffs’ claims will be preserved; 1 c. The complaint (Doc. No. 1), the respective prisoner authorization forms and administrative orders (Doc. Nos. 10, 20, 22, 34, 37, 4345, 47, 48), waivers of service forms (Doc. Nos. 40, 55), and copy of this Memorandum and Order will be docketed in each individual Plaintiff’s action; d. Each Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If a Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time prescribed herein, the Court will direct Defendants to respond to the remaining First Amendment mail interference/enhancement claim as set forth in the original complaint (Doc. No. 1); and 6. Defendants’ motion to stay the proceedings (Doc. No. 83), is DENIED as moot. s/Sylvia H. Rambo SYLVIA H. RAMBO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?