Perry v. Ebbert et al

Filing 24

ORDER re: motion 11 to dismiss - It is hereby ORDERED that court places parties on notice that it may consider exhaustion in its role as fact finder under Small v Camden & parties may supplement record w/in 20 days from date of this order w/ any addt'l supp'ng evidence relevant to exhaustion of admin remedies. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/19/19. (ki)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARRYL PERRY, Plaintiff v. DAVID J. EBBERT, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO. 1:18-CV-870 (Chief Judge Conner) ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of defendants’ motion (Doc. 11) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and it appearing that whether plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), is at issue, and it further appearing that plaintiff seeks to excuse compliance with the exhaustion requirement (see Docs. 1, 20), and the court noting that it must provide the parties notice and an opportunity to be heard on the exhaustion issue, see Paladino v. Newsome, 885 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2018), it is hereby ORDERED that the court places the parties on notice that it may consider exhaustion in its role as fact finder under Small v. Camden Cty., 728 F.3d 265 (3d Cir. 2013), and the parties may supplement the record within twenty (20) days from the date of this order with any additional supporting evidence relevant to exhaustion of administrative remedies. /S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?