Woolley v. Groft

Filing 19

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 18 ) - AND NOW, on this 16th day of February 2021, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant Michael Groft (Defendant)s motion to d ismiss (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED as follows:1. Plaintiff Mark E. Woolley (Plaintiff)s claims relating to demand notes executed in 2008 and 2009 (Counts I, III, IV, and V) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely; and 2. Defendant shall file an answer to Plaintiffs remaining claims within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 2/16/21. (dmn)

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-01887-YK Document 19 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARK E. WOOLLEY, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL GROFT, Defendant : : : : : : : No. 1:20-cv-01887 (Judge Kane) ORDER AND NOW, on this 16th day of February 2021, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant Michael Groft (“Defendant”)’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Mark E. Woolley (“Plaintiff”)’s claims relating to demand notes executed in 2008 and 2009 (Counts I, III, IV, and V) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely; and 2. Defendant shall file an answer to Plaintiff’s remaining claims within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. s/ Yvette Kane Yvette Kane, District Judge United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?