Ramos v. Saul

Filing 16

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioners decision is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and this Order. After entering judgment in favor of Lopez and against the Commissioner as set forth in the prior sentence, the Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on July 29, 2022. (kjn)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WENDY BANDALA RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL NO.: 1:20-CV-02415 (Magistrate Judge Schwab) ORDER July 29, 2022 For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and this Order. After entering judgment in favor of Lopez and against the Kilolo Kijakazi is now the Commissioner of Social Security, and she is automatically substituted as the defendant in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d) (providing that when a public officer sued in his or her official capacity ceases to hold office while an action is pending, “[t]he officer’s successor is automatically substituted as a party”); 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“Any action instituted in accordance with this subsection shall survive notwithstanding any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security or any vacancy in such office.”). 1 Commissioner as set forth in the prior sentence, the Clerk of Court shall close this case. S/Susan E. Schwab Susan E. Schwab United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?