Barasky v. Shoemaker et al

Filing 30

ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 29 : 1. Dfts mtn to dismiss 20 is GRANTED;2. Pltfs complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Pltf may not file an amended complaint in this matter; 24 3. Pltfs mtn to compel is DENIED; and4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned action. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 6/3/21. (ma)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTHONY BARASKY,
Plaintiff
v.
BRAD SHOEMAKER, et al.,
Defendants

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

No. 1:20-cv-2457
(Judge Rambo)

ORDER
AND NOW, on this 3rd day of June 2021, for the reasons set forth in the
Memorandum accompanying this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED;

2.

Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may not file an amended complaint in this
matter;

3.

Plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc. No. 24) is DENIED; and

4.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned action.
s/ Sylvia H. Rambo
United States District Judge